Inspector of Police Kallal P.S vs Pethuraj — 224/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSV190005152026
Filing Number
515/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
224/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
254
Police Station
Kallal Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police Kallal P.S
Respondent(s)
Pethuraj
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Disposed
Enquiry
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 13-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 12-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 11-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Crl.M.P. 224/2026 The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj (accused no. 2) in a temple bell theft case (Crime no. 254/2025). The court found that while Pethuraj was implicated primarily based on a co-accused's confession statement with no strong independent evidence, his continued custody was unwarranted given the investigation's near completion. The court imposed stringent bail conditions including a ₹1,00,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting, and restrictions on absconding and witness interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl.M.P. 224/2026 The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj (accused no. 2) in a temple bell theft case (Crime no. 254/2025). The court found that while Pethuraj was implicated primarily based on a co-accused's confession statement with no strong independent evidence, his continued custody was unwarranted given the investigation's near completion. The court imposed stringent bail conditions including a ₹1,00,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting, and restrictions on absconding and witness interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts