Sasikala vs Pallathur PS — 223/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305(a). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSV190005142026

Filing Number

514/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

223/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi

Judge

5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

38

Police Station

Pallathur Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sasikala

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pallathur PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    IA orderView PDF

    Case Summary: Crl.M.P.223/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi allowed Sasikala's petition and ordered police to return seized jewelry and Rs. 2,77,500 in cash to her. The court relied on the Supreme Court principle that valuable articles like gold ornaments should not remain in police custody indefinitely and can be returned with appropriate safeguards. Key Conditions: The petitioner must execute a Rs. 10 lakh bond with two sureties, file an undertaking affidavit, sign a detailed inventory prepared by police, refrain from selling or altering the jewelry, and produce all items when directed by the court—failure to do so will result in bond forfeiture and legal action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 223/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.M.P.223/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi allowed Sasikala's petition and ordered police to return seized jewelry and Rs. 2,77,500 in cash to her. The court relied on the Supreme Court principle that valuable articles like gold ornaments should not remain in police custody indefinitely and can be returned with appropriate safeguards. Key Conditions: The petitioner must execute a Rs. 10 lakh bond with two sureties, file an undertaking affidavit, sign a detailed inventory prepared by police, refrain from selling or altering the jewelry, and produce all items when directed by the court—failure to do so will result in bond forfeiture and legal action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case