Sasikala vs Pallathur PS — 223/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305(a). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSV190005142026
Filing Number
514/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
223/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
38
Police Station
Pallathur Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sasikala
Respondent(s)
Pallathur PS (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Disposed
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Crl.M.P.223/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi allowed Sasikala's petition and ordered police to return seized jewelry and Rs. 2,77,500 in cash to her. The court relied on the Supreme Court principle that valuable articles like gold ornaments should not remain in police custody indefinitely and can be returned with appropriate safeguards. Key Conditions: The petitioner must execute a Rs. 10 lakh bond with two sureties, file an undertaking affidavit, sign a detailed inventory prepared by police, refrain from selling or altering the jewelry, and produce all items when directed by the court—failure to do so will result in bond forfeiture and legal action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl.M.P.223/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi allowed Sasikala's petition and ordered police to return seized jewelry and Rs. 2,77,500 in cash to her. The court relied on the Supreme Court principle that valuable articles like gold ornaments should not remain in police custody indefinitely and can be returned with appropriate safeguards. Key Conditions: The petitioner must execute a Rs. 10 lakh bond with two sureties, file an undertaking affidavit, sign a detailed inventory prepared by police, refrain from selling or altering the jewelry, and produce all items when directed by the court—failure to do so will result in bond forfeiture and legal action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts