Inspector of Police Kallal P.S vs Pethuraj — 219/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 264. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSV190005042026

Case disposed

Filing Number

504/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

219/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi

Judge

5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

262

Police Station

Kallal Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 264

Petitioner(s)

Inspector of Police Kallal P.S

Respondent(s)

Pethuraj

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi

23-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

Enquiry

13-03-2026

Appearance

12-03-2026

Appearance

10-03-2026

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
IA order

Case Summary: Crl.M.P. 219/2026 The Judicial Magistrate Court in Karaikudi granted bail to accused Pethuraj in a temple bell theft case (Crime 262/2025). Pethuraj was arrested February 25, 2026, and implicated under Section 303(2) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita based solely on his co-accused's confession statement, with no independent corroborating evidence. The court found continued detention unwarranted given the investigation's near-completion and weak circumstantial case, imposing stringent conditions including Rs. 1 lakh bond, daily police reporting, non-tampering with evidence, and jurisdiction restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.M.P. 219/2026 The Judicial Magistrate Court in Karaikudi granted bail to accused Pethuraj in a temple bell theft case (Crime 262/2025). Pethuraj was arrested February 25, 2026, and implicated under Section 303(2) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita based solely on his co-accused's confession statement, with no independent corroborating evidence. The court found continued detention unwarranted given the investigation's near-completion and weak circumstantial case, imposing stringent conditions including Rs. 1 lakh bond, daily police reporting, non-tampering with evidence, and jurisdiction restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case