Inspector of Police Kallal P.S vs Pethuraj — 219/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 264. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSV190005042026
Filing Number
504/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
219/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
262
Police Station
Kallal Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police Kallal P.S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pethuraj
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
IA orderView PDF
Case Summary: Crl.M.P. 219/2026 The Judicial Magistrate Court in Karaikudi granted bail to accused Pethuraj in a temple bell theft case (Crime 262/2025). Pethuraj was arrested February 25, 2026, and implicated under Section 303(2) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita based solely on his co-accused's confession statement, with no independent corroborating evidence. The court found continued detention unwarranted given the investigation's near-completion and weak circumstantial case, imposing stringent conditions including Rs. 1 lakh bond, daily police reporting, non-tampering with evidence, and jurisdiction restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
-
17-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
-
13-Mar-2026
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
-
12-Mar-2026
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 219/2026
Case Summary: Crl.M.P. 219/2026 The Judicial Magistrate Court in Karaikudi granted bail to accused Pethuraj in a temple bell theft case (Crime 262/2025). Pethuraj was arrested February 25, 2026, and implicated under Section 303(2) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita based solely on his co-accused's confession statement, with no independent corroborating evidence. The court found continued detention unwarranted given the investigation's near-completion and weak circumstantial case, imposing stringent conditions including Rs. 1 lakh bond, daily police reporting, non-tampering with evidence, and jurisdiction restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts