Inspector of Police Kallal P.S vs Pethuraj — 218/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSV190005032026
Filing Number
503/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
218/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
257
Police Station
Kallal Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police Kallal P.S
Respondent(s)
Pethuraj
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Disposed
Enquiry
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 13-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 12-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 10-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 218/2026 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj (Accused No. 2) in a temple bell theft case (Crime No. 257/2025 under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita). The court found that Pethuraj's implication relied primarily on the co-accused's confession with no strong independent evidence, and investigation was substantially complete. The court balanced gravity of allegations against personal liberty and imposed stringent bail conditions including Rs. 1 lakh bond with two sureties, daily police reporting (10 AM and 5 PM), prohibition on absconding, witness tampering, leaving jurisdiction, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 218/2026 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj (Accused No. 2) in a temple bell theft case (Crime No. 257/2025 under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita). The court found that Pethuraj's implication relied primarily on the co-accused's confession with no strong independent evidence, and investigation was substantially complete. The court balanced gravity of allegations against personal liberty and imposed stringent bail conditions including Rs. 1 lakh bond with two sureties, daily police reporting (10 AM and 5 PM), prohibition on absconding, witness tampering, leaving jurisdiction, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts