Inspector of Police Kallal P.S vs Pethuraj — 218/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSV190005032026
Filing Number
503/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
218/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
257
Police Station
Kallal Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police Kallal P.S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pethuraj
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
IA orderView PDF
Case 218/2026 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj (Accused No. 2) in a temple bell theft case (Crime No. 257/2025 under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita). The court found that Pethuraj's implication relied primarily on the co-accused's confession with no strong independent evidence, and investigation was substantially complete. The court balanced gravity of allegations against personal liberty and imposed stringent bail conditions including Rs. 1 lakh bond with two sureties, daily police reporting (10 AM and 5 PM), prohibition on absconding, witness tampering, leaving jurisdiction, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
-
17-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
-
13-Mar-2026
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
-
12-Mar-2026
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 218/2026
Case 218/2026 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj (Accused No. 2) in a temple bell theft case (Crime No. 257/2025 under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita). The court found that Pethuraj's implication relied primarily on the co-accused's confession with no strong independent evidence, and investigation was substantially complete. The court balanced gravity of allegations against personal liberty and imposed stringent bail conditions including Rs. 1 lakh bond with two sureties, daily police reporting (10 AM and 5 PM), prohibition on absconding, witness tampering, leaving jurisdiction, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts