Inspector of Police Kallal P.S vs Pethuraj — 215/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSV190005002026
Filing Number
500/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
215/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
255
Police Station
Kallal Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police Kallal P.S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pethuraj
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
IA orderView PDF
Case 215/2026 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court in Karaikudi allowed Pethuraj's bail petition in a temple bell theft case (Crime No. 255/2025). Pethuraj, arrested February 25, 2026, was charged under Section 303(2) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita based primarily on his co-accused's confession statement, with no strong independent corroborating evidence. The court found continued detention unjustified since investigation was substantially complete and released him on bail with stringent conditions including Rs. 1 lakh bond, twice-daily police reporting, and restrictions on absconding or witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
-
17-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
-
13-Mar-2026
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
-
12-Mar-2026
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 215/2026
Case 215/2026 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court in Karaikudi allowed Pethuraj's bail petition in a temple bell theft case (Crime No. 255/2025). Pethuraj, arrested February 25, 2026, was charged under Section 303(2) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita based primarily on his co-accused's confession statement, with no strong independent corroborating evidence. The court found continued detention unjustified since investigation was substantially complete and released him on bail with stringent conditions including Rs. 1 lakh bond, twice-daily police reporting, and restrictions on absconding or witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts