Inspector of Police Kallal P.S vs Pethuraj — 214/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSV190004992026
Filing Number
499/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
214/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Karaikudi
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
253
Police Station
Kallal Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police Kallal P.S
Respondent(s)
Pethuraj
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi
Disposed
Enquiry
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 13-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 12-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 10-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Crl.M.P. No. 214/2026 The Judicial Magistrate Court in Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj (accused no. 2) in a temple bell theft case (Crime No. 253/2025). The court found that while Pethuraj was implicated based on the first accused's confession statement, there was no strong independent material connecting him to the offense, and the investigation had substantially progressed. The court balanced the gravity of allegations against his prolonged custody and released him on bail with stringent conditions including a ₹1,00,000 bond, daily police reporting twice, and restrictions on leaving jurisdiction or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl.M.P. No. 214/2026 The Judicial Magistrate Court in Karaikudi granted bail to Pethuraj (accused no. 2) in a temple bell theft case (Crime No. 253/2025). The court found that while Pethuraj was implicated based on the first accused's confession statement, there was no strong independent material connecting him to the offense, and the investigation had substantially progressed. The court balanced the gravity of allegations against his prolonged custody and released him on bail with stringent conditions including a ₹1,00,000 bond, daily police reporting twice, and restrictions on leaving jurisdiction or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts