VIJITHA R vs RAJ KUMAR — 27/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.
MC - Maintenance Case
CNR: TNSV160013852025
e-Filing Number
19-09-2025
Filing Number
1331/2025
Filing Date
19-Sep-2025
Registration No
27/2025
Registration Date
19-Sep-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Singampunari
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIJITHA R
Adv. CHINTHAMANI R M
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJ KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: MC No. 27/2025 Court: District Court of Sivagangai, Singampunari, Tamil Nadu Parties: Vijitha R (Petitioner) v. Raj Kumar (Respondent) Decision: The court granted the petitioner's maintenance petition under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The respondent is ordered to pay monthly maintenance of ₹20,000 to the petitioner, effective from the date of the petition filing, with arrears covering the intervening three-month period to be settled within three months from the judgment date. The court found the respondent liable to maintain the petitioner as her lawfully married husband based on documentary evidence (marriage certificate) and her testimony, despite the respondent's non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
12-Mar-2026
Orders
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
09-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
06-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
02-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
27-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
26-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
20-Feb-2026
Orders
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
17-Feb-2026
Orders
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
07-Feb-2026
Counter
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
03-Feb-2026
Counter
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
30-Jan-2026
Counter
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
12-Jan-2026
Counter
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
29-Dec-2025
Counter
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
10-Dec-2025
Lok Adalat
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
04-Dec-2025
Lok Adalat
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
26-Nov-2025
Lok Adalat
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
24-Nov-2025
Counter
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
17-Nov-2025
Counter
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
03-Nov-2025
Await Reports
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
22-Oct-2025
Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
19-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 27/2025
Case Summary: MC No. 27/2025 Court: District Court of Sivagangai, Singampunari, Tamil Nadu Parties: Vijitha R (Petitioner) v. Raj Kumar (Respondent) Decision: The court granted the petitioner's maintenance petition under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The respondent is ordered to pay monthly maintenance of ₹20,000 to the petitioner, effective from the date of the petition filing, with arrears covering the intervening three-month period to be settled within three months from the judgment date. The court found the respondent liable to maintain the petitioner as her lawfully married husband based on documentary evidence (marriage certificate) and her testimony, despite the respondent's non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts