VIJITHA R vs RAJ KUMAR — 27/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.

MC - Maintenance Case

CNR: TNSV160013852025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

19-09-2025

Filing Number

1331/2025

Filing Date

19-09-2025

Registration No

27/2025

Registration Date

19-09-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Singampunari

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144

Petitioner(s)

VIJITHA R

Adv. CHINTHAMANI R M

Respondent(s)

RAJ KUMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Orders

09-03-2026

Arguments

06-03-2026

Arguments

02-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: MC No. 27/2025 Court: District Court of Sivagangai, Singampunari, Tamil Nadu Parties: Vijitha R (Petitioner) v. Raj Kumar (Respondent) Decision: The court granted the petitioner's maintenance petition under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The respondent is ordered to pay monthly maintenance of ₹20,000 to the petitioner, effective from the date of the petition filing, with arrears covering the intervening three-month period to be settled within three months from the judgment date. The court found the respondent liable to maintain the petitioner as her lawfully married husband based on documentary evidence (marriage certificate) and her testimony, despite the respondent's non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MC No. 27/2025 Court: District Court of Sivagangai, Singampunari, Tamil Nadu Parties: Vijitha R (Petitioner) v. Raj Kumar (Respondent) Decision: The court granted the petitioner's maintenance petition under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The respondent is ordered to pay monthly maintenance of ₹20,000 to the petitioner, effective from the date of the petition filing, with arrears covering the intervening three-month period to be settled within three months from the judgment date. The court found the respondent liable to maintain the petitioner as her lawfully married husband based on documentary evidence (marriage certificate) and her testimony, despite the respondent's non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Singampunari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case