The sI of Police, Singampunari P.S vs Murugan — 205/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,506(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV160007072022
Next Hearing
13th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2143/2022
Filing Date
07-11-2022
Registration No
205/2022
Registration Date
07-11-2022
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Singampunari
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
FIR Details
FIR Number
110
Police Station
Singampunari Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The sI of Police, Singampunari P.S
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Murugan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Evidence | |
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness deposition (PW.1) in Criminal Case No. 205/2022 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Singampunari, recorded on 10.03.2026. The witness (Priyatharshini) testified under BNSS Section 355 regarding a violent incident on 14.08.2022 where the accused allegedly assaulted her family with weapons, causing injuries to multiple family members including herself, her mother, and brother. The cross-examination by the accused was closed as the accused's counsel declined to proceed with questioning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness deposition (PW.1) in Criminal Case No. 205/2022 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Singampunari, recorded on 10.03.2026. The witness (Priyatharshini) testified under BNSS Section 355 regarding a violent incident on 14.08.2022 where the accused allegedly assaulted her family with weapons, causing injuries to multiple family members including herself, her mother, and brother. The cross-examination by the accused was closed as the accused's counsel declined to proceed with questioning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts