C.Ilavarasan vs L.Periyasamy — 289/2019
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Service Pending-Warrant. Next hearing: 27th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV160003602019
Next Hearing
27th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
289/2019
Filing Date
07-07-2018
Registration No
289/2019
Registration Date
07-07-2018
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Singampunari
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
C.Ilavarasan
Respondent(s)
L.Periyasamy
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
Service Pending-Warrant
Service Pending-Warrant
Service Pending-Warrant
Service Pending-Warrant
Service Pending-Warrant
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Service Pending-Warrant | |
| 06-04-2026 | Service Pending-Warrant | |
| 27-03-2026 | Service Pending-Warrant | |
| 10-03-2026 | Service Pending-Warrant | |
| 16-02-2026 | Service Pending-Warrant |
Interim Orders
This is a Deposition of Witness document (not a court order) in a criminal case (C.C. No. 289/2019) before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Singampunari. The witness, Periyasamy, testified on 02.02.2026 regarding disputes involving land/loan transactions with multiple parties including Selvaraj, Krupasamy, and Kanesan. The witness provided detailed account of events spanning approximately 15 years, including allegations of coercion to purchase items and subsequent legal disputes, with extensive cross-examination covering contradictions in his statements about document authenticity and party relationships. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Deposition of Witness document (not a court order) in a criminal case (C.C. No. 289/2019) before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Singampunari. The witness, Periyasamy, testified on 02.02.2026 regarding disputes involving land/loan transactions with multiple parties including Selvaraj, Krupasamy, and Kanesan. The witness provided detailed account of events spanning approximately 15 years, including allegations of coercion to purchase items and subsequent legal disputes, with extensive cross-examination covering contradictions in his statements about document authenticity and party relationships. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts