Ayyachamy vs Chinnathal — 105/2020
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c), 25(d), 42. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV160002532020
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
105/2020
Filing Date
18-11-2020
Registration No
105/2020
Registration Date
18-11-2020
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Singampunari
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ayyachamy
Adv. Tmt.Kasthuri
Respondent(s)
Chinnathal
Packiam
Chithra
Raman
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a District Munsiff's Court order from Singampunari dated March 17, 2026 in Original Case No. 105/2020 under Section 10(1)(a) of the Indian Succession Act, 1857. The document records cross-examination testimony of the defendant's witness regarding a land dispute (Survey No. 89/3 C, 1 acre 37 cents) and an agreement dated April 9, 1992 for property succession. The court examined the witness's credibility regarding the plaintiff Ayyachami's possession and the document's authenticity, with the witness making contradictory statements about his observations and knowledge of the property and agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a District Munsiff's Court order from Singampunari dated March 17, 2026 in Original Case No. 105/2020 under Section 10(1)(a) of the Indian Succession Act, 1857. The document records cross-examination testimony of the defendant's witness regarding a land dispute (Survey No. 89/3 C, 1 acre 37 cents) and an agreement dated April 9, 1992 for property succession. The court examined the witness's credibility regarding the plaintiff Ayyachami's possession and the document's authenticity, with the witness making contradictory statements about his observations and knowledge of the property and agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts