The SI of Police, S.S.Kottai P.s vs Selvam — 1/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338 IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 29th April 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNSV160000772022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1/2022
Filing Date
06-01-2022
Registration No
1/2022
Registration Date
06-01-2022
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Singampunari
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
81
Police Station
S.S.Kottai Police Station
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The SI of Police, S.S.Kottai P.s
Respondent(s)
Selvam
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 20-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition (PW.7) in a criminal case before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Singampunari, recorded on 18.03.2026. The witness, a retired police constable, testified about investigating a case involving injuries to three persons (Kalidhas, Bandi, and Madhuvanthi) under FIR 81/2019, and confirmed that the charges were amended from IPC sections 279, 337, 338 to reflect the nature of injuries sustained. During cross-examination, the defense challenged the witness's account, particularly regarding the location of the incident and the defendant's alleged involvement, with the witness maintaining his testimony despite contradictions raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition (PW.7) in a criminal case before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Singampunari, recorded on 18.03.2026. The witness, a retired police constable, testified about investigating a case involving injuries to three persons (Kalidhas, Bandi, and Madhuvanthi) under FIR 81/2019, and confirmed that the charges were amended from IPC sections 279, 337, 338 to reflect the nature of injuries sustained. During cross-examination, the defense challenged the witness's account, particularly regarding the location of the incident and the defendant's alleged involvement, with the witness maintaining his testimony despite contradictions raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts