SI of Police, Nerkuppai PS vs Lakshmanan — 1/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341, 294(b), 323, 506(ii), 109. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV160000612020
Filing Number
1/2020
Filing Date
08-Jan-2020
Registration No
1/2020
Registration Date
08-Jan-2020
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Singampunari
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SI of Police, Nerkuppai PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
-
1.Lakshmanan
-
2.Sarasu @ Saraswathi
-
3.Chokkalingam
-
4.Sevugan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: CC No. 1/2020 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four defendants (Lakshmanan, Sarasu, Chokkalingam, and Sevagun) under IPC sections 341, 294(b), 506(2), 323, and 109, finding the prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court determined that witness testimonies from the complainant and victim contained significant contradictions with the FIR, lacked corroborating evidence, and contained newly introduced details not in original statements. Critical physical evidence (weapons allegedly used, damaged door tiles) was never seized or produced. The court noted inconsistencies regarding injury descriptions, location details, and witness presence at the incident, undermining the prosecution's case credibility and reliability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
11-Mar-2026
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
04-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
12-Nov-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
12-Nov-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
24-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
28-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
19-Jul-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
19-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
10-Jul-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
10-Jul-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
03-Jul-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
22-May-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
19-Mar-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
19-Feb-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
08-Jan-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
12-Dec-2024
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
07-Nov-2024
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
26-Sep-2024
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
07-Aug-2024
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
19-Jun-2024
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
08-May-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
13-Mar-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
25-Jan-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
06-Dec-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
05-Oct-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
05-Aug-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
20-Jul-2023
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
20-Jun-2023
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
15-May-2023
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
02-May-2023
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
10-Mar-2023
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
03-Feb-2023
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
23-Dec-2022
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
03-Nov-2022
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
08-Sep-2022
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
21-Jul-2022
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
26-May-2022
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
21-Apr-2022
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate,Singampunari
-
10-Feb-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 1/2020
Case Summary: CC No. 1/2020 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four defendants (Lakshmanan, Sarasu, Chokkalingam, and Sevagun) under IPC sections 341, 294(b), 506(2), 323, and 109, finding the prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court determined that witness testimonies from the complainant and victim contained significant contradictions with the FIR, lacked corroborating evidence, and contained newly introduced details not in original statements. Critical physical evidence (weapons allegedly used, damaged door tiles) was never seized or produced. The court noted inconsistencies regarding injury descriptions, location details, and witness presence at the incident, undermining the prosecution's case credibility and reliability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts