Minor. Veeramakali vs District Collector, Sivagangai and 7 others — 47/2023
Case under --- Section 25(D). Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 17th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV150055182023
Filing Number
71/2023
Filing Date
30-11-2023
Registration No
47/2023
Registration Date
30-11-2023
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruppuvanam
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate , Tiruppuvanam
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Partially Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Minor. Veeramakali
Adv. M.Ramalingam
Respondent(s)
District Collector, Sivagangai and 7 others
Thasildar, Thiruppuvanam
Rajamani
Kalpanadevi
Saranya
Dhanusri
Samuthiradevi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate , Tiruppuvanam
Disposed
Judgement
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 47/2023 The court partially allowed the petitioner's succession claim. The District Court of Thiruppuvanam held that minor Veeramakali is a legal heir of the deceased Veeripandian (who died intestate on 28.07.2019) through his second wife Kanivemozhi, and recognized the petitioner and respondents 4-7 as heirs. However, the claim against respondent 3 (the deceased's father) was dismissed as he is not a primary heir under Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and the misjoinder of parties defect was upheld. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 47/2023 The court partially allowed the petitioner's succession claim. The District Court of Thiruppuvanam held that minor Veeramakali is a legal heir of the deceased Veeripandian (who died intestate on 28.07.2019) through his second wife Kanivemozhi, and recognized the petitioner and respondents 4-7 as heirs. However, the claim against respondent 3 (the deceased's father) was dismissed as he is not a primary heir under Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and the misjoinder of parties defect was upheld. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts