Kalungi vs Nagammal — 57/2021
Case under --- Section 25(b). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV150030802021
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
Filing Number
62/2021
Filing Date
01-11-2021
Registration No
57/2021
Registration Date
01-11-2021
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruppuvanam
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate , Tiruppuvanam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kalungi
Adv. Habipur Rahman
Valli
Rani
Respondent(s)
Nagammal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate , Tiruppuvanam
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS 57/2021 (Kalungi & Valli & Rani v. Nagammal) On 12 March 2026, the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Tirupuvanam recorded cross-examination of the respondent's witness (Ramar) regarding land records and property documents. The witness denied several allegations, including that documents were falsified, that the respondent's health prevented her testimony, and that he gave false evidence in support of the respondent. The witness maintained the authenticity of the UDR and derived property documents. No counter-examination was recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS 57/2021 (Kalungi & Valli & Rani v. Nagammal) On 12 March 2026, the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Tirupuvanam recorded cross-examination of the respondent's witness (Ramar) regarding land records and property documents. The witness denied several allegations, including that documents were falsified, that the respondent's health prevented her testimony, and that he gave false evidence in support of the respondent. The witness maintained the authenticity of the UDR and derived property documents. No counter-examination was recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts