Jeyaraman vs District Collector and 2others — 26/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O6R14A. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV150027852022
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
Filing Number
47/2022
Filing Date
13-07-2022
Registration No
26/2022
Registration Date
13-07-2022
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruppuvanam
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate , Tiruppuvanam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jeyaraman
Adv. Veerapandi
Respondent(s)
District Collector and 2others
Tashildar
Town Panchayath
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate , Tiruppuvanam
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 23-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS 26/2022 (IA 7/2025) The District Civil Court in Tirupuvannam allowed the Interlocutory Application filed by petitioners Kumar, Subramaniam, Nagarajan, Saravana Kumar, Muthuraja, and Kannan, permitting them to be impleaded as defendants (respondents 4-9) in the underlying civil suit. The court found that the petitioners had legitimate interest in the case concerning disputed property (Survey No. 144/2 with 0.77.5 hectares) in Mukkudi village, as they claimed traditional management rights over a temple located on the property. The court rejected arguments that the application was barred by procedural rules or that the petitioners' interests would not be prejudiced, granting the relief sought with no award of costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS 26/2022 (IA 7/2025) The District Civil Court in Tirupuvannam allowed the Interlocutory Application filed by petitioners Kumar, Subramaniam, Nagarajan, Saravana Kumar, Muthuraja, and Kannan, permitting them to be impleaded as defendants (respondents 4-9) in the underlying civil suit. The court found that the petitioners had legitimate interest in the case concerning disputed property (Survey No. 144/2 with 0.77.5 hectares) in Mukkudi village, as they claimed traditional management rights over a temple located on the property. The court rejected arguments that the application was barred by procedural rules or that the petitioners' interests would not be prejudiced, granting the relief sought with no award of costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts