Tamilvanan vs Gandhiyammal — 24/2023
Case under --- Section 30. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV150023642023
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
35/2023
Filing Date
22-06-2023
Registration No
24/2023
Registration Date
22-06-2023
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruppuvanam
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate , Tiruppuvanam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tamilvanan
Adv. M.Ganesan
Respondent(s)
Gandhiyammal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate , Tiruppuvanam
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case 24/2023 (Tamilvanan v. Gandhiyamml) - Summary: On April 9, 2026, the District Munsif Court at Tirupuvanam recorded the cross-examination testimony of witness Saktivel in this property dispute case under Section 6(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1869. The witness testified regarding documents (receipts from 2015 onwards) submitted as additional evidence and denied ever having possession or beneficial interest in the property claimed to have been gifted by the petitioner's father. The court acknowledged the testimony as correct; the case status following this hearing remains pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 24/2023 (Tamilvanan v. Gandhiyamml) - Summary: On April 9, 2026, the District Munsif Court at Tirupuvanam recorded the cross-examination testimony of witness Saktivel in this property dispute case under Section 6(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1869. The witness testified regarding documents (receipts from 2015 onwards) submitted as additional evidence and denied ever having possession or beneficial interest in the property claimed to have been gifted by the petitioner's father. The court acknowledged the testimony as correct; the case status following this hearing remains pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts