SI of police, Thiruppuvanam PS vs Pon Eswaramoorthi — 790/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th May 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSV150018972025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1831/2025
Filing Date
27-11-2025
Registration No
790/2025
Registration Date
27-11-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruppuvanam
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate , Tiruppuvanam
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
Police Station
Thiruppuvanam Police Station
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI of police, Thiruppuvanam PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
Pon Eswaramoorthi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate , Tiruppuvanam
Disposed
Orders
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-04-2026 | Orders | |
| 20-04-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 23-03-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 10-03-2026 | Await Reports |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District Magistrate of Tirupuvannam approved the petitioner's application and directed the Tirupuvannam Police Station to register an FIR and conduct investigation under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, based on the petitioner's complaint regarding criminal intimidation, property damage, and trespass by six named individuals and 30 unnamed persons. The court found prima facie evidence that the respondents unlawfully entered the petitioner's agricultural land, destroyed approximately 550 coconut saplings using weapons and tractors, and physically attacked the petitioner's security guard, warranting criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District Magistrate of Tirupuvannam approved the petitioner's application and directed the Tirupuvannam Police Station to register an FIR and conduct investigation under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, based on the petitioner's complaint regarding criminal intimidation, property damage, and trespass by six named individuals and 30 unnamed persons. The court found prima facie evidence that the respondents unlawfully entered the petitioner's agricultural land, destroyed approximately 550 coconut saplings using weapons and tractors, and physically attacked the petitioner's security guard, warranting criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts