Boominathan vs Malliga and 1 another — 18/2023
Case under --- Section 25(b). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV150013202023
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
25/2023
Filing Date
28-04-2023
Registration No
18/2023
Registration Date
28-04-2023
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruppuvanam
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate , Tiruppuvanam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Boominathan
Adv. S.Nagendran
Respondent(s)
Malliga and 1 another
Muthaiah
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate , Tiruppuvanam
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: OS.18/2023 | Date: April 9, 2026 | Court: District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Tirupuvanam Outcome: The case concerns a property dispute over agricultural land (Dahva Shettu) involving competing claims of ownership and possession based on alleged inheritance rights and land transfers. The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of Defendant No. 2, wherein the defendant contested the plaintiff's claims regarding land allocation, UDR (Unrestricted Dhak Rights) registration errors, and alleged unauthorized occupation, asserting instead that Defendant No. 2's father, Periyakaruppa Thevar, legitimately inherited and occupied the property. The matter remains pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: OS.18/2023 | Date: April 9, 2026 | Court: District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Tirupuvanam Outcome: The case concerns a property dispute over agricultural land (Dahva Shettu) involving competing claims of ownership and possession based on alleged inheritance rights and land transfers. The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of Defendant No. 2, wherein the defendant contested the plaintiff's claims regarding land allocation, UDR (Unrestricted Dhak Rights) registration errors, and alleged unauthorized occupation, asserting instead that Defendant No. 2's father, Periyakaruppa Thevar, legitimately inherited and occupied the property. The matter remains pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts