Manickaselvam V vs Suguna — 11/2022
Case under --- Section 25(b). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV150012942022
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
25/2022
Filing Date
05-04-2022
Registration No
11/2022
Registration Date
05-04-2022
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruppuvanam
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate , Tiruppuvanam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manickaselvam V
Adv. Sathiyendran R
Respondent(s)
Suguna
Karunakara Sethupathy
Alaguvel
Sivapriya
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate , Tiruppuvanam
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case 11/2022 Summary: On 5 March 2026, the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate at Tiruppanamum recorded the cross-examination of witness Venkataasalam regarding a land dispute involving property purchase. The witness testified about purchasing 25 cents of land in his wife's name in 2017 from the first respondent, describing boundary details, access path dimensions (15 feet wide, 200 feet long), and the property's current condition. Cross-examination by respondents' counsel continued, with the witness addressing questions about property ownership, boundaries, and access arrangements. The cross-examination was adjourned to continue at a later date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 11/2022 Summary: On 5 March 2026, the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate at Tiruppanamum recorded the cross-examination of witness Venkataasalam regarding a land dispute involving property purchase. The witness testified about purchasing 25 cents of land in his wife's name in 2017 from the first respondent, describing boundary details, access path dimensions (15 feet wide, 200 feet long), and the property's current condition. Cross-examination by respondents' counsel continued, with the witness addressing questions about property ownership, boundaries, and access arrangements. The cross-examination was adjourned to continue at a later date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts