N.Radha vs Kannappan @ Verranan ambalam and 4 others Advocate - Mr. Mohanasundaram( D1,D — 127/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d),27(C). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV150002622019
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
131/2019
Filing Date
07-08-2018
Registration No
127/2019
Registration Date
07-08-2018
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruppuvanam
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate , Tiruppuvanam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
N.Radha
Adv. Tr.SN.Maheswaran,B.A.,B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Kannappan @ Verranan ambalam and 4 others Advocate - Mr. Mohanasundaram( D1,D
, Mr. Sridharan D2,D3,D
Pal
Angel
Rani
Dr.Castro
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate , Tiruppuvanam
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 18-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 16-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 07-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 02-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 127/2019 - N. Radha v. Kannappan @ Verranan Ambalam & Others Outcome: Petition dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's application seeking to appoint Vallanad as guardian for the minor girl Varshika (also known as Mahisha), affirming the existing guardianship of Rama under GWOP No.1/2018. Key Issue: Whether Vallanad should be appointed as guardian for the minor Varshika in place of the existing guardian Rama, following the death of the original petitioner's father (Kannappan). Court's Reasoning: The District Court upheld the High Court's decision (dated 08.04.2025) finding that disturbing the established guardianship arrangement would be detrimental to the child's best interests. The court noted Rama's dedication to the minor's welfare, education, and upbringing, contrasting with Vallanad's remarriage and inability to provide equivalent care. The petition was found to contradict the High Court's judgment and constituted gross abuse of court process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 127/2019 - N. Radha v. Kannappan @ Verranan Ambalam & Others Outcome: Petition dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's application seeking to appoint Vallanad as guardian for the minor girl Varshika (also known as Mahisha), affirming the existing guardianship of Rama under GWOP No.1/2018. Key Issue: Whether Vallanad should be appointed as guardian for the minor Varshika in place of the existing guardian Rama, following the death of the original petitioner's father (Kannappan). Court's Reasoning: The District Court upheld the High Court's decision (dated 08.04.2025) finding that disturbing the established guardianship arrangement would be detrimental to the child's best interests. The court noted Rama's dedication to the minor's welfare, education, and upbringing, contrasting with Vallanad's remarriage and inability to provide equivalent care. The petition was found to contradict the High Court's judgment and constituted gross abuse of court process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts