Mottaiya Swami Temple, Thiruppuvanam vs T.Selvaraj — 69/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV150001482019
Filing Number
71/2019
Filing Date
12-12-2016
Registration No
69/2019
Registration Date
12-12-2016
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruppuvanam
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate , Tiruppuvanam
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mottaiya Swami Temple, Thiruppuvanam
Adv. Mr.R.G.Shankar Ganesh
Respondent(s)
T.Selvaraj
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate , Tiruppuvanam
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 19-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY: O.S. 69/2019 Court & Judge: District Court, Thiruppuvanam; Judge R. Venkateshan Prasanth Petitioner: Mottaiya Swami Temple, Thiruppuvanam Respondent: T. Selvaraj & Others DECISION The court dismissed the temple's petition on grounds of limitation and inadequate representation. While acknowledging the temple's legitimate claims about property misappropriation, the court held that: (1) the temple failed to add all necessary parties to the suit; (2) the petition was barred by limitation as certain issues became known around 2000 but suit was filed in 2016; and (3) as a private temple, the HR&CE Act's protections (which suspend limitation periods for property recovery) do not apply. The court determined that respondent #1, based on a 1999 partition deed, validly holds 10 cents of the disputed 70-cent property through possession and tax payments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY: O.S. 69/2019 Court & Judge: District Court, Thiruppuvanam; Judge R. Venkateshan Prasanth Petitioner: Mottaiya Swami Temple, Thiruppuvanam Respondent: T. Selvaraj & Others DECISION The court dismissed the temple's petition on grounds of limitation and inadequate representation. While acknowledging the temple's legitimate claims about property misappropriation, the court held that: (1) the temple failed to add all necessary parties to the suit; (2) the petition was barred by limitation as certain issues became known around 2000 but suit was filed in 2016; and (3) as a private temple, the HR&CE Act's protections (which suspend limitation periods for property recovery) do not apply. The court determined that respondent #1, based on a 1999 partition deed, validly holds 10 cents of the disputed 70-cent property through possession and tax payments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts