Inspector of Police, Sipcot P.S vs Sukumaran — 305/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),506(ii),307,326. Status: Service Pending-Summon. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNSV140012952023
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
854/2023
Filing Date
15-12-2023
Registration No
305/2023
Registration Date
15-12-2023
Court
Sub Court, Manamadurai
Judge
1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, Sipcot P.S
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Sukumaran
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 12-03-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 05-03-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 04-02-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 08-01-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
Interim Orders
Case 305/2023 Summary This case involves witness depositions before the Manamadurai Assistant Sessions Judge regarding an alleged violent assault on December 31, 2021. Three witnesses testified that accused Sukumaran and two others (Paal Paandi and Karuppu) attacked a man named Pandiarajan on a road in the Periyakulam-Idaikkatoor area, stabbing him with knives and causing serious injuries. The witnesses claimed they also attacked them with weapons, and the accused escaped with stolen items. However, during cross-examination, all three witnesses recanted their statements, admitting they gave false testimony supporting the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 305/2023 Summary This case involves witness depositions before the Manamadurai Assistant Sessions Judge regarding an alleged violent assault on December 31, 2021. Three witnesses testified that accused Sukumaran and two others (Paal Paandi and Karuppu) attacked a man named Pandiarajan on a road in the Periyakulam-Idaikkatoor area, stabbing him with knives and causing serious injuries. The witnesses claimed they also attacked them with weapons, and the accused escaped with stolen items. However, during cross-examination, all three witnesses recanted their statements, admitting they gave false testimony supporting the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts