S. Rajesh vs S. Poomayil — 206/2023
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 25(b),27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV140011182023
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
373/2023
Filing Date
18-10-2023
Registration No
206/2023
Registration Date
18-10-2023
Court
Sub Court, Manamadurai
Judge
1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S. Rajesh
Adv. A.Karuppaiah B.Com.B.L
Shanmugam
Respondent(s)
S. Poomayil
Mariyappan
Ganavel
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Await Reports
Await Reports
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 07-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 12-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 05-02-2026 | Await Reports |
| 08-01-2026 | Await Reports |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. 206/2023 Court: Madurai High Court Date: 28 February 2024 Judge: S. Rajesh, J. Parties: S. Rajesh and Shanmugam (petitioners) vs. S. Poomayil, Mariyappan, and Ganavel (respondents) Outcome: Petition DISMISSED. The court rejected the petitioners' claims regarding disputed property ownership and refused to grant an injunction preventing the respondents from constructing on the contested land. The court found the petitioners' allegations of unauthorized encroachment unsubstantiated and held that the respondents possess legitimate rights over the property dating to 1982. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. 206/2023 Court: Madurai High Court Date: 28 February 2024 Judge: S. Rajesh, J. Parties: S. Rajesh and Shanmugam (petitioners) vs. S. Poomayil, Mariyappan, and Ganavel (respondents) Outcome: Petition DISMISSED. The court rejected the petitioners' claims regarding disputed property ownership and refused to grant an injunction preventing the respondents from constructing on the contested land. The court found the petitioners' allegations of unauthorized encroachment unsubstantiated and held that the respondents possess legitimate rights over the property dating to 1982. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts