V.A.Lingam vs A.Lingam Advocate - Ad.Mrs.Sangareshwari — 115/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b), 25(d). Status: IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV140007842024
Filing Number
330/2024
Filing Date
12-Sep-2024
Registration No
115/2024
Registration Date
12-Sep-2024
Court
Sub Court, Manamadurai
Judge
1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
Last updated 10-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.V.A.Lingam
Adv. Adv.Mr.T.Muthuramalingam
Respondent(s)
-
1.A.Lingam Advocate - Ad.Mrs.Sangareshwari
-
2.L.Dhandeeswaran
Adv. Ad.Mrs.Sangareshwari
-
3.District Collector
-
4.Subregisrar
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Apr-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
23-Mar-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
25-Feb-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
23-Feb-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
11-Feb-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
04-Feb-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
21-Jan-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
02-Jan-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
15-Dec-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
04-Dec-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
03-Dec-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
02-Dec-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
28-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
25-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
19-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
14-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
31-Oct-2025
Judgement
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
30-Oct-2025
Judgement
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
27-Oct-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
Summary: In O.S. No. 115/2024, the court dismissed the plaintiff's petition under Section 6(1) of the Registration Act, 1969. The court found that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence regarding the property ownership and could not establish the required documentary proof to support the claim. The petition was dismissed as the plaintiff could not satisfactorily prove the legitimacy of the registered documents or property details in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Oct-2025
Judgement
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
24-Oct-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
16-Oct-2025
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
16-Oct-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
10-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
07-Oct-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
07-Oct-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
18-Sep-2025
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
16-Sep-2025
Issues
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
01-Sep-2025
Issues
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
11-Aug-2025
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
31-Jul-2025
Written Statement
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
30-Jul-2025
Written Statement
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
16-Jul-2025
Written Statement
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
04-Jul-2025
Written Statement
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
03-Jun-2025
Written Statement
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
02-Apr-2025
Written Statement
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
21-Feb-2025
Appearance
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
21-Jan-2025
Written Statement
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
26-Nov-2024
Written Statement
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
22-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 115/2024
Summary: In O.S. No. 115/2024, the court dismissed the plaintiff's petition under Section 6(1) of the Registration Act, 1969. The court found that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence regarding the property ownership and could not establish the required documentary proof to support the claim. The petition was dismissed as the plaintiff could not satisfactorily prove the legitimacy of the registered documents or property details in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts