V.A.Lingam vs A.Lingam Advocate - Ad.Mrs.Sangareshwari — 115/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 25(b), 25(d). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV140007842024
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
330/2024
Filing Date
12-09-2024
Registration No
115/2024
Registration Date
12-09-2024
Court
Sub Court, Manamadurai
Judge
1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
V.A.Lingam
Adv. Adv.Mr.T.Muthuramalingam
Respondent(s)
A.Lingam Advocate - Ad.Mrs.Sangareshwari
L.Dhandeeswaran
Adv. Ad.Mrs.Sangareshwari
District Collector
Subregisrar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Arguments
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 23-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 25-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 23-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: In O.S. No. 115/2024, the court dismissed the plaintiff's petition under Section 6(1) of the Registration Act, 1969. The court found that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence regarding the property ownership and could not establish the required documentary proof to support the claim. The petition was dismissed as the plaintiff could not satisfactorily prove the legitimacy of the registered documents or property details in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In O.S. No. 115/2024, the court dismissed the plaintiff's petition under Section 6(1) of the Registration Act, 1969. The court found that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence regarding the property ownership and could not establish the required documentary proof to support the claim. The petition was dismissed as the plaintiff could not satisfactorily prove the legitimacy of the registered documents or property details in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts