Sarputeen vs Aminal Beevi — 157/2021
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 37(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV140003502021
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
157/2021
Filing Date
29-10-2021
Registration No
157/2021
Registration Date
29-10-2021
Court
Sub Court, Manamadurai
Judge
1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sarputeen
Pennisha
Abdhul Majeedhu
Syed Raviyath
Jumma beevi
Saralbeevi
Nasrin Begam
Thameem nisha
Jakira banu
Saibu Nisha
Zahir Ushen
kamar Nisha
Majitha banu
Respondent(s)
Aminal Beevi
Kabar Khan
Saboor nisha
majeedhi kan
Mohamed Baisul kan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
Evidence
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 05-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. No. 157/2021 In this civil suit heard on December 3, 2024, the court recorded the affidavit evidence of the third defendant (Abdhul Majeedhu) under Section 6(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The defendant testified that the affidavit and its signature were authentic and prepared based on his information. The case was adjourned for cross-examination of the defendant at the request of the opposing counsel, with documentary evidence (genealogy record and public documents) admitted into the record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. No. 157/2021 In this civil suit heard on December 3, 2024, the court recorded the affidavit evidence of the third defendant (Abdhul Majeedhu) under Section 6(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The defendant testified that the affidavit and its signature were authentic and prepared based on his information. The case was adjourned for cross-examination of the defendant at the request of the opposing counsel, with documentary evidence (genealogy record and public documents) admitted into the record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts