Mariyammal vs Selvaraj pillai — 44/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 24(1),24(3). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNSV140001992022
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
44/2022
Filing Date
19-09-2022
Registration No
44/2022
Registration Date
19-09-2022
Court
Sub Court, Manamadurai
Judge
1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mariyammal
Adv. Mr. D.Ajoypriyan M.Com,B.L
Pothumponnu
Adv. Mr.D.Ajoypriyan M.com,B.L
M.Dhanyasri (Mainar)
Adv. Mr.D.Ajoypriyan M.Com,B.L
M.Kaneshka (Mainar)
Adv. Mr.D.Ajoypriyan M.Com,B.L
Respondent(s)
Selvaraj pillai
The Branch Manager New India Assurance company Madurai
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
Lok Adalat
Amendment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 17-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 14-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 12-03-2026 | Lok Adalat |
| 13-02-2026 | Amendment |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: MCOP 44/2022 This motor vehicle accident compensation petition involved a two-wheeler accident where the husband of petitioner Mariyammal sustained head injuries. The court recorded the petitioner's testimony regarding the accident circumstances, her husband's condition, and income claims. The petitioner contested the respondent insurance company's position and the opposing vehicle driver's contentions regarding fault and compensation. After hearing arguments and examining documents (including Exhibit 14 showing the husband's age as 37 and education up to 9th grade), the court allowed the petition and directed the insurance company to pay compensation, rejecting the insurer's arguments that liability was disputed or compensation excessive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: MCOP 44/2022 This motor vehicle accident compensation petition involved a two-wheeler accident where the husband of petitioner Mariyammal sustained head injuries. The court recorded the petitioner's testimony regarding the accident circumstances, her husband's condition, and income claims. The petitioner contested the respondent insurance company's position and the opposing vehicle driver's contentions regarding fault and compensation. After hearing arguments and examining documents (including Exhibit 14 showing the husband's age as 37 and education up to 9th grade), the court allowed the petition and directed the insurance company to pay compensation, rejecting the insurer's arguments that liability was disputed or compensation excessive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts