Mariyammal vs Selvaraj pillai — 44/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 24(1),24(3). Status: IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNSV140001992022
Filing Number
44/2022
Filing Date
19-Sep-2022
Registration No
44/2022
Registration Date
19-Sep-2022
Court
Sub Court, Manamadurai
Judge
1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mariyammal
Adv. Mr. D.Ajoypriyan M.Com,B.L
-
2.Pothumponnu
Adv. Mr.D.Ajoypriyan M.com,B.L
-
3.M.Dhanyasri (Mainar)
Adv. Mr.D.Ajoypriyan M.Com,B.L
-
4.M.Kaneshka (Mainar)
Adv. Mr.D.Ajoypriyan M.Com,B.L
Respondent(s)
-
1.Selvaraj pillai
-
2.The Branch Manager New India Assurance company Madurai
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Apr-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
17-Apr-2026
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
14-Mar-2026
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
12-Mar-2026
Lok Adalat
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
13-Feb-2026
Amendment
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
06-Jan-2026
Amendment
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
03-Dec-2025
Amendment
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
01-Dec-2025
Amendment
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
13-Nov-2025
Amendment
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
08-Sep-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
11-Aug-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
14-Jul-2025
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
17-Jun-2025
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
11-Jun-2025
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
09-Jun-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
21-Apr-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
03-Apr-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
20-Mar-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
Case Summary: MCOP 44/2022 This motor vehicle accident compensation petition involved a two-wheeler accident where the husband of petitioner Mariyammal sustained head injuries. The court recorded the petitioner's testimony regarding the accident circumstances, her husband's condition, and income claims. The petitioner contested the respondent insurance company's position and the opposing vehicle driver's contentions regarding fault and compensation. After hearing arguments and examining documents (including Exhibit 14 showing the husband's age as 37 and education up to 9th grade), the court allowed the petition and directed the insurance company to pay compensation, rejecting the insurer's arguments that liability was disputed or compensation excessive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
12-Mar-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
12-Mar-2025
Part Heard
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
27-Feb-2025
Enquiry
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
17-Feb-2025
Enquiry
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
03-Feb-2025
Enquiry
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
09-Jan-2025
Enquiry
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
13-Dec-2024
Enquiry
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
09-Dec-2024
Enquiry
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
11-Nov-2024
Enquiry
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
15-Oct-2024
Enquiry
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
04-Sep-2024
Enquiry
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
06-Aug-2024
Enquiry
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
09-Jul-2024
Enquiry
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
13-Jun-2024
Enquiry
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
05-Apr-2024
Enquiry
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
02-Feb-2024
Enquiry
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
19-Dec-2023
Enquiry
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
09-Dec-2023
Lok Adalat
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
29-Nov-2023
Lok Adalat
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
11-Oct-2023
Enquiry
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
09-Sep-2023
Enquiry
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
02-Aug-2023
Enquiry
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
21-Jun-2023
Enquiry
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
21-Apr-2023
Counter
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
27-Feb-2023
Counter
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
24-Jan-2023
Counter
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
22-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Sep-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 44/2022
Case Summary: MCOP 44/2022 This motor vehicle accident compensation petition involved a two-wheeler accident where the husband of petitioner Mariyammal sustained head injuries. The court recorded the petitioner's testimony regarding the accident circumstances, her husband's condition, and income claims. The petitioner contested the respondent insurance company's position and the opposing vehicle driver's contentions regarding fault and compensation. After hearing arguments and examining documents (including Exhibit 14 showing the husband's age as 37 and education up to 9th grade), the court allowed the petition and directed the insurance company to pay compensation, rejecting the insurer's arguments that liability was disputed or compensation excessive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts