Linton ajith vs Sathish Advocate - R — 5/2020
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140, 166, amend 54/94. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNSV140001662020
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
5/2020
Filing Date
12-02-2020
Registration No
5/2020
Registration Date
12-02-2020
Court
Sub Court, Manamadurai
Judge
1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Linton ajith
Adv. Mr.R.Prabakar
Respondent(s)
Sathish Advocate - R
Oriental Insurance Company Divisional office 2, through its divisional manager
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
Orders
Orders
Orders
Orders
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Orders | |
| 27-04-2026 | Orders | |
| 22-04-2026 | Orders | |
| 17-04-2026 | Orders | |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a Motor Accident Claims Petition (MCOP No. 5/2020) heard in the Madras High Court on January 10, 2025. The petitioner, Linton Ajit, filed his affidavit under Section 6(1) of the Indian Evidence Act 1969, submitting 40 documentary exhibits including FIR copy, vehicle registration, driver's license, insurance documents, medical reports, bills, and identity proofs. The court admitted the petitioner's evidence and adjourned the hearing on the advocate's request to continue examination of the second respondent, with examination-in-chief recorded and approved by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a Motor Accident Claims Petition (MCOP No. 5/2020) heard in the Madras High Court on January 10, 2025. The petitioner, Linton Ajit, filed his affidavit under Section 6(1) of the Indian Evidence Act 1969, submitting 40 documentary exhibits including FIR copy, vehicle registration, driver's license, insurance documents, medical reports, bills, and identity proofs. The court admitted the petitioner's evidence and adjourned the hearing on the advocate's request to continue examination of the second respondent, with examination-in-chief recorded and approved by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts