Saroja (through power agent Muthu) vs Mariammal @ Rajathi — 115/2019
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(2). Status: Stay. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV140001432019
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
115/2019
Filing Date
19-08-2013
Registration No
115/2019
Registration Date
19-08-2013
Court
Sub Court, Manamadurai
Judge
1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Saroja (through power agent Muthu)
Adv. Mr.P.Athimoolam B.A.B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Mariammal @ Rajathi
Nagalakshmi
Muthuraja
Adv. Mr.T.Muthuramalingam
Murugan
Rajasekaran
Anandan
Adv. Mr.T.Muthuramalingam M.A.B.L.,
Sekar
Adv. Mr.M.Muthukumar B.Sc.B.L.,
Soundaram
Karunanithi
Adv. Mr.T.Muthuramalingam M.A.B.L.,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
Stay
Stay
Evidence
Stay
Stay
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Stay |
| 12-03-2026 | Stay |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-01-2026 | Stay |
| 16-12-2025 | Stay |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS 115/2019 Case: Saroja (through power agent Muthu) v. Mariammal @ Rajathi, Nagalakshmi, and Muthuraja Court: District Court, Madurai (Judge: Dr. R. Rekha, B.A., B.L.) Date: 13 December 2023 Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court rejected petitioner's claims regarding property ownership documents and signatures, finding insufficient grounds for the relief sought. The court determined that certain attestation documents (dated 26.07.2000 and 03.06.2000) lacked valid witness signatures and could not bind the parties. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS 115/2019 Case: Saroja (through power agent Muthu) v. Mariammal @ Rajathi, Nagalakshmi, and Muthuraja Court: District Court, Madurai (Judge: Dr. R. Rekha, B.A., B.L.) Date: 13 December 2023 Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court rejected petitioner's claims regarding property ownership documents and signatures, finding insufficient grounds for the relief sought. The court determined that certain attestation documents (dated 26.07.2000 and 03.06.2000) lacked valid witness signatures and could not bind the parties. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts