Pandi vs Rasu Udaiyar Advocate - Mr.Malaikani — 211/2019
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV140001372019
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
211/2019
Filing Date
30-08-2019
Registration No
211/2019
Registration Date
30-08-2019
Court
Sub Court, Manamadurai
Judge
1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pandi
Adv. Adv.Mr.S.Raghuman
Respondent(s)
Rasu Udaiyar Advocate - Mr.Malaikani
V.Tamilmaran
Adv. Mr.T.Muthuramalingam M.A.,B.L.,
P.Rathkrishnan
Adv. Mr.T.Muthuramalingam M.A.,B.L.,
K.Kasinathan
Adv. Mr.T.Muthuramalingam M.A.,B.L.,
Thangaiya
Adv. Mr.T.Muthuramalingam M.A.,B.L.,
Veeraiah
Adv. Mr.T.Muthuramalingam M.A.,B.L.,
Ramanathan @ Raman
Adv. Mr.T.Muthuramalingam M.A.,B.L.,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Trial
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 02-04-2026 | Trial | |
| 23-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 10-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 18-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The petition for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 of CPC filed by S. Pandi seeking to restrain defendants from interfering with temple construction work has been dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case and irreparable loss, and noted that granting the relief would essentially amount to granting the main suit relief, which is impermissible in interlocutory applications. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The petition for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 of CPC filed by S. Pandi seeking to restrain defendants from interfering with temple construction work has been dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case and irreparable loss, and noted that granting the relief would essentially amount to granting the main suit relief, which is impermissible in interlocutory applications. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts