Thirumalai vs Archunan — 67/2022
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(2),25(d),27(c). Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV140001342022
Filing Number
67/2022
Filing Date
25-Apr-2022
Registration No
67/2022
Registration Date
25-Apr-2022
Court
Sub Court, Manamadurai
Judge
1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Thirumalai
Adv. Mr.D.Ajaipriyan M.com,B.L
Respondent(s)
-
1.Archunan
-
2.Ananthavalli
-
3.Sasikumar
-
4.Venkat Retdi
Adv. Mr.Sureshbabu
-
5.Subregistrar Subregistrar office Manamadurai
-
6.Tamil Nadu Coverment through its District collector sivagangai
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Apr-2026
Amendment
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
06-Apr-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
12-Mar-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
05-Mar-2026
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
24-Feb-2026
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
12-Feb-2026
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
04-Feb-2026
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
20-Jan-2026
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
03-Dec-2025
Steps
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
21-Nov-2025
Steps
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
27-Oct-2025
IA orderView PDF
Case Summary: 67/2022 Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court granted permission for Thirumalai (petitioner/plaintiff) to continue civil case 67/2022 through a power of attorney holder (Anitha Moomu) representing the power of attorney agent, since Thirumalai's husband (the actual party) is necessarily residing abroad for livelihood purposes. Key Point: The court rejected the respondents' objection that a power of attorney holder cannot represent a party, citing Supreme Court precedent that allows power of attorney holders to appear and act on behalf of parties in civil proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Oct-2025
Steps
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
16-Oct-2025
Orders
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
24-Sep-2025
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
17-Sep-2025
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
01-Sep-2025
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
05-Aug-2025
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
11-Jul-2025
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
20-Jun-2025
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
12-Jun-2025
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
22-Apr-2025
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
01-Apr-2025
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
11-Mar-2025
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
06-Mar-2025
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
06-Feb-2025
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
14-Dec-2024
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
18-Nov-2024
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
05-Nov-2024
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
15-Oct-2024
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
12-Sep-2024
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
13-Aug-2024
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
15-Jul-2024
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
13-Jun-2024
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
03-Apr-2024
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
18-Mar-2024
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
21-Feb-2024
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
09-Jan-2024
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
06-Dec-2023
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
07-Nov-2023
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
20-Sep-2023
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
18-Jul-2023
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
06-Jun-2023
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
02-Jun-2023
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
10-Mar-2023
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
27-Jan-2023
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
07-Dec-2022
Trial
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
06-Sep-2022
Written Statement
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
03-Aug-2022
Written Statement
Sub Judge,Manamadurai
-
23-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 67/2022
Case Summary: 67/2022 Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court granted permission for Thirumalai (petitioner/plaintiff) to continue civil case 67/2022 through a power of attorney holder (Anitha Moomu) representing the power of attorney agent, since Thirumalai's husband (the actual party) is necessarily residing abroad for livelihood purposes. Key Point: The court rejected the respondents' objection that a power of attorney holder cannot represent a party, citing Supreme Court precedent that allows power of attorney holders to appear and act on behalf of parties in civil proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts