Mudhammal vs Ponnalagu — 17/2023
Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 37(2),25(d). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV140001122023
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
40/2023
Filing Date
10-01-2023
Registration No
17/2023
Registration Date
30-01-2023
Court
Sub Court, Manamadurai
Judge
1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mudhammal
Adv. Mr.S.Ilangovan B.A,B.L
Respondent(s)
Ponnalagu
Ramasamy
Director Public health and Depaetment of Preventive Medicine Chennai
Sub Registrar Manamadurai
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 27-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 18-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 10-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 08-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary This Tamil Nadu High Court order (O.S. No. 17/2023, dated April 4, 2024) partially allowed an application for party amendment under CPC Section 10(2). The court struck the plaintiff from a property dispute and added defendants 5 and 6 as co-plaintiffs, while dismissing the application regarding defendants 3 and 4 due to procedural irregularities and lack of proper jurisdiction over a disputed land deed from 2008. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary This Tamil Nadu High Court order (O.S. No. 17/2023, dated April 4, 2024) partially allowed an application for party amendment under CPC Section 10(2). The court struck the plaintiff from a property dispute and added defendants 5 and 6 as co-plaintiffs, while dismissing the application regarding defendants 3 and 4 due to procedural irregularities and lack of proper jurisdiction over a disputed land deed from 2008. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts