Pandiyammal vs Ammaponnu Advocate - Mr.D.Balasubramaniyan, M.A. M.L. — 5/2021
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 30th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV140000052021
Filing Number
5/2021
Filing Date
07-01-2021
Registration No
5/2021
Registration Date
07-01-2021
Court
Sub Court, Manamadurai
Judge
1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pandiyammal
Adv. Mr.M.Muthukumar, B.Sc., B.L.,
Muthumani
Adv. Mr.M.Muthukumar, B.Sc. B.L.,
Kesavan
Annalakshmi
Ashok kumar
Anbuselvi
Arasukumar
Respondent(s)
Ammaponnu Advocate - Mr.D.Balasubramaniyan, M.A. M.L.
Kaviyarasan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge,Manamadurai
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 25-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
The court's judgment in this inheritance dispute case held that the defendant's claims regarding property distribution were partially rejected. The court found that the petitioners (Pandiyammal, Muthumani, and Kesavan) are entitled to a 1/3 share of the deceased's properties as legal heirs, while rejecting the defendant's contentions that certain properties were gifted or that the adopted son had claims over the estate. The judgment emphasized that without proper documentation and evidence, the defendant's assertions regarding property transfers could not be upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court's judgment in this inheritance dispute case held that the defendant's claims regarding property distribution were partially rejected. The court found that the petitioners (Pandiyammal, Muthumani, and Kesavan) are entitled to a 1/3 share of the deceased's properties as legal heirs, while rejecting the defendant's contentions that certain properties were gifted or that the adopted son had claims over the estate. The judgment emphasized that without proper documentation and evidence, the defendant's assertions regarding property transfers could not be upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts