Ramasamy vs Veeramanikandan — 152/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV120040722023
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
16-12-2023
Filing Number
4072/2023
Filing Date
29-12-2023
Registration No
152/2023
Registration Date
29-12-2023
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramasamy
Adv. BALAJI KANNAN
Respondent(s)
Veeramanikandan
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
Evidence
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-05-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 07-05-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 30-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 02-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC No. 152/2023 (Ramasamy v. Veeramanikandan) Outcome: The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of petitioner Ramasamy on 09.10.2025. Ramasamy, a former employee of vehicle dealership companies, testified regarding allegations of financial misconduct involving unauthorized bank transfers and disputed loans. The court accepted his statement and recorded his assertions denying misappropriation charges, claiming funds were personal loans from company managers, not company embezzlement. The case remains pending with cross-examination concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC No. 152/2023 (Ramasamy v. Veeramanikandan) Outcome: The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of petitioner Ramasamy on 09.10.2025. Ramasamy, a former employee of vehicle dealership companies, testified regarding allegations of financial misconduct involving unauthorized bank transfers and disputed loans. The court accepted his statement and recorded his assertions denying misappropriation charges, claiming funds were personal loans from company managers, not company embezzlement. The case remains pending with cross-examination concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts