S Gunasundari vs Vinotha Uthayakumar — 9/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Questioning. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV120039292023
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
13-12-2023
Filing Number
3929/2023
Filing Date
15-12-2023
Registration No
9/2024
Registration Date
22-01-2024
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S Gunasundari
Adv. BALAJI KANNAN
Respondent(s)
Vinotha Uthayakumar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-05-2026 | Questioning |
| 20-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 9/2024 In this civil case between S Gunasundari (petitioner) and Vinotha Uthayakumar (respondent), the court heard cross-examination testimony regarding a disputed loan transaction. Gunasundari claimed she lent a large sum to the respondent on 31.03.2022, while the respondent denied being a relative and disputed the loan amount. The case involves allegations of a Rs. 2 lakh loan from February 2023 and subsequent disputes over bank transactions, with references to a related criminal case (CC 134/2023) where the respondent was acquitted. The court recorded the witness examination, which was transcribed and read back to the witness for confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Copy of deposition
Summary of Case 9/2024 In this civil case between S Gunasundari (petitioner) and Vinotha Uthayakumar (respondent), the court heard cross-examination testimony regarding a disputed loan transaction. Gunasundari claimed she lent a large sum to the respondent on 31.03.2022, while the respondent denied being a relative and disputed the loan amount. The case involves allegations of a Rs. 2 lakh loan from February 2023 and subsequent disputes over bank transactions, with references to a related criminal case (CC 134/2023) where the respondent was acquitted. The court recorded the witness examination, which was transcribed and read back to the witness for confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts