RAMASAMY vs PIRAMANANDHAN — 126/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV120030752023
Next Hearing
29th May 2026
e-Filing Number
26-09-2023
Filing Number
3075/2023
Filing Date
26-09-2023
Registration No
126/2023
Registration Date
26-10-2023
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMASAMY
Adv. Dhuraimurugan M
Respondent(s)
PIRAMANANDHAN
MUTHULAKSHMI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 16-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
In C.C. No. 126/2023 before the Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court, Karaikudi, the deposition of witness PW.2 (Suresh) was recorded on 25.09.2025 under Chapter XXIII of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The witness testified regarding the prosecution's case, confirming the facts presented and acknowledging the details without raising objections; no documents were produced during examination. The witness was cross-examined and the statement was admitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In C.C. No. 126/2023 before the Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court, Karaikudi, the deposition of witness PW.2 (Suresh) was recorded on 25.09.2025 under Chapter XXIII of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The witness testified regarding the prosecution's case, confirming the facts presented and acknowledging the details without raising objections; no documents were produced during examination. The witness was cross-examined and the statement was admitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts