S.NIRMALA vs DR.C.SURESH — 117/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 142,138. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNSV120030012023

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

03rd June 2026

e-Filing Number

31-08-2023

Filing Number

3001/2023

Filing Date

20-09-2023

Registration No

117/2023

Registration Date

27-09-2023

Court

Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 142,138
Code of Criminal Procedure Section 200,357
Indian Penal Code Section 420

Petitioner(s)

S.NIRMALA

Adv. Ganapathy Sornam

Respondent(s)

DR.C.SURESH

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi

22-05-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

15-05-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

06-05-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

09-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

06-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

01-04-2025
Copy of deposition

Case Summary: C.C. No. 117/2023 (S. Nirmala v. Dr. C. Suresh) Outcome: The case proceeded to cross-examination of the respondent (Dr. C. Suresh). The respondent testified regarding allegations of unauthorized microfinance operations, loan transactions, and document-related disputes. The court recorded the respondent's statement admitting to certain facts while denying others related to loans of Rs. 5-10 lakhs and disputed property documents. The matter remains pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C. No. 117/2023 (S. Nirmala v. Dr. C. Suresh) Outcome: The case proceeded to cross-examination of the respondent (Dr. C. Suresh). The respondent testified regarding allegations of unauthorized microfinance operations, loan transactions, and document-related disputes. The court recorded the respondent's statement admitting to certain facts while denying others related to loans of Rs. 5-10 lakhs and disputed property documents. The matter remains pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case