Naina Mohammed vs Syed Ibrahim — 182/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV120027842024
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
20-09-2024
Filing Number
2783/2024
Filing Date
15-10-2024
Registration No
182/2024
Registration Date
21-10-2024
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Naina Mohammed
Adv. Kasi Poopathi
Respondent(s)
Syed Ibrahim
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 182/2024 Case Status: Witness deposition recorded (PW.2) This is a witness deposition document from the Fast Track Court, Karaikudi, dated 02.04.2026. The second prosecution witness (PW.2), a bank manager at Karur Vysya Bank with 8 years of experience, testified regarding the respondent Syed Ibrahim's bank account for "Chettinad Zig Zag" enterprise. The witness confirmed that Ibrahim held full authority over the account and provided bank statement records (01.01.2024 to 02.05.2024). The witness stated that a cheque presented by the petitioner was flagged by Ibrahim requesting its stoppage, and that insufficient funds existed in the account on the cheque's presentation date. Cross-examination was conducted without objections, and the deposition was completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 182/2024 Case Status: Witness deposition recorded (PW.2) This is a witness deposition document from the Fast Track Court, Karaikudi, dated 02.04.2026. The second prosecution witness (PW.2), a bank manager at Karur Vysya Bank with 8 years of experience, testified regarding the respondent Syed Ibrahim's bank account for "Chettinad Zig Zag" enterprise. The witness confirmed that Ibrahim held full authority over the account and provided bank statement records (01.01.2024 to 02.05.2024). The witness stated that a cheque presented by the petitioner was flagged by Ibrahim requesting its stoppage, and that insufficient funds existed in the account on the cheque's presentation date. Cross-examination was conducted without objections, and the deposition was completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts