karnan vs latha — 158/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNSV120026132024

Arguments

Next Hearing

01st June 2026

e-Filing Number

11-09-2024

Filing Number

2612/2024

Filing Date

13-09-2024

Registration No

158/2024

Registration Date

13-09-2024

Court

Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi

FIR Details

Police Station

Alagapapuram Police Station

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

karnan

Adv. Karthik Vakil

Respondent(s)

latha

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi

25-05-2026

Arguments

20-05-2026

Evidence

14-05-2026

Evidence

16-04-2026

Evidence

02-04-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

14-05-2026
Copy of deposition

Case Summary: CC No. 158/2024 Petitioner: Karnan | Respondent: Latha | Date: 14.05.2026 In this cross-examination testimony (recorded under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873), petitioner Karnan testified regarding a loan dispute with respondent Latha. Karnan claimed he lent approximately Rs. 2 lakhs to Latha for real estate purposes, with total outstanding claims across 4-5 cases amounting to approximately Rs. 6 lakhs. However, during cross-examination, Karnan admitted to significant inconsistencies: he could not provide proper documentation or witness verification for the alleged loans, lacked government authorization as a moneylender, could not explain details about Latha's business or financial status despite knowing her for 3.5 years, and failed to produce signed agreements. The court found his testimony unconvincing and lacking credibility regarding the alleged loan transactions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 158/2024 Petitioner: Karnan | Respondent: Latha | Date: 14.05.2026 In this cross-examination testimony (recorded under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873), petitioner Karnan testified regarding a loan dispute with respondent Latha. Karnan claimed he lent approximately Rs. 2 lakhs to Latha for real estate purposes, with total outstanding claims across 4-5 cases amounting to approximately Rs. 6 lakhs. However, during cross-examination, Karnan admitted to significant inconsistencies: he could not provide proper documentation or witness verification for the alleged loans, lacked government authorization as a moneylender, could not explain details about Latha's business or financial status despite knowing her for 3.5 years, and failed to produce signed agreements. The court found his testimony unconvincing and lacking credibility regarding the alleged loan transactions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case