LOURDHRAJ vs THIRUNAVUKARASU — 151/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV120026012024
e-Filing Number
04-09-2024
Filing Number
2600/2024
Filing Date
12-Sep-2024
Registration No
151/2024
Registration Date
12-Sep-2024
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LOURDHRAJ
Adv. DENSINGH A
Respondent(s)
-
1.THIRUNAVUKARASU
Case History
-
01-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-May-2026
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
18-May-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
07-May-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
30-Oct-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
Case Summary: CC No. 151/2024 In this cross-examination testimony dated 30.10.2025, petitioner Lourdhraj gave evidence regarding an alleged loan dispute with respondent Thirunavukarasu. Lourdhraj testified that he lent Rs. 50,000 to Thirunavukarasu in October 2023 after his son's wedding, with repayment terms of Rs. 5,000 monthly over 10 months. He claimed Thirunavukarasu repaid only one month's installment and provided a cheque that was rejected due to "bank not in clearing mode." Lourdhraj admitted to no written agreement, no witnesses to the loan transaction, and later filed a false cheque case. The court recorded his testimony regarding the loan's circumstances, repayment attempts, and disputes over vehicle documents and maintenance charges, ultimately accepting his sworn statement as evidence in the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
31-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
17-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
09-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
17-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
20-May-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
08-May-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
22-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
26-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
23-Jan-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
23-Jan-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
30-Dec-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
10-Dec-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
21-Nov-2024
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
20-Nov-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
14-Oct-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
12-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 151/2024
Case Summary: CC No. 151/2024 In this cross-examination testimony dated 30.10.2025, petitioner Lourdhraj gave evidence regarding an alleged loan dispute with respondent Thirunavukarasu. Lourdhraj testified that he lent Rs. 50,000 to Thirunavukarasu in October 2023 after his son's wedding, with repayment terms of Rs. 5,000 monthly over 10 months. He claimed Thirunavukarasu repaid only one month's installment and provided a cheque that was rejected due to "bank not in clearing mode." Lourdhraj admitted to no written agreement, no witnesses to the loan transaction, and later filed a false cheque case. The court recorded his testimony regarding the loan's circumstances, repayment attempts, and disputes over vehicle documents and maintenance charges, ultimately accepting his sworn statement as evidence in the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts