LOURDHRAJ vs THIRUNAVUKARASU — 151/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant Next hearing 01-Jul-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNSV120026012024

e-Filing Number

04-09-2024

Filing Number

2600/2024

Filing Date

12-Sep-2024

Registration No

151/2024

Registration Date

12-Sep-2024

Court

Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LOURDHRAJ

    Adv. DENSINGH A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THIRUNAVUKARASU

Case History

  1. 01-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-May-2026

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  3. 18-May-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  4. 07-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  8. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  9. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  10. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  11. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  12. 30-Oct-2025

    Copy of depositionView PDF

    Case Summary: CC No. 151/2024 In this cross-examination testimony dated 30.10.2025, petitioner Lourdhraj gave evidence regarding an alleged loan dispute with respondent Thirunavukarasu. Lourdhraj testified that he lent Rs. 50,000 to Thirunavukarasu in October 2023 after his son's wedding, with repayment terms of Rs. 5,000 monthly over 10 months. He claimed Thirunavukarasu repaid only one month's installment and provided a cheque that was rejected due to "bank not in clearing mode." Lourdhraj admitted to no written agreement, no witnesses to the loan transaction, and later filed a false cheque case. The court recorded his testimony regarding the loan's circumstances, repayment attempts, and disputes over vehicle documents and maintenance charges, ultimately accepting his sworn statement as evidence in the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  14. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  15. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  16. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  17. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  18. 09-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  19. 17-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  20. 20-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  21. 08-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  22. 22-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  23. 26-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  24. 23-Jan-2025

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  25. 23-Jan-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  26. 30-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  27. 10-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  28. 21-Nov-2024

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  29. 20-Nov-2024

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  30. 14-Oct-2024

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  31. 12-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 12-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 151/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 151/2024 In this cross-examination testimony dated 30.10.2025, petitioner Lourdhraj gave evidence regarding an alleged loan dispute with respondent Thirunavukarasu. Lourdhraj testified that he lent Rs. 50,000 to Thirunavukarasu in October 2023 after his son's wedding, with repayment terms of Rs. 5,000 monthly over 10 months. He claimed Thirunavukarasu repaid only one month's installment and provided a cheque that was rejected due to "bank not in clearing mode." Lourdhraj admitted to no written agreement, no witnesses to the loan transaction, and later filed a false cheque case. The court recorded his testimony regarding the loan's circumstances, repayment attempts, and disputes over vehicle documents and maintenance charges, ultimately accepting his sworn statement as evidence in the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case