LOURDHRAJ vs THIRUNAVUKARASU — 151/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV120026012024
Next Hearing
01st July 2026
e-Filing Number
04-09-2024
Filing Number
2600/2024
Filing Date
12-09-2024
Registration No
151/2024
Registration Date
12-09-2024
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LOURDHRAJ
Adv. DENSINGH A
Respondent(s)
THIRUNAVUKARASU
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-05-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 18-05-2026 | Questioning |
| 07-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC No. 151/2024 In this cross-examination testimony dated 30.10.2025, petitioner Lourdhraj gave evidence regarding an alleged loan dispute with respondent Thirunavukarasu. Lourdhraj testified that he lent Rs. 50,000 to Thirunavukarasu in October 2023 after his son's wedding, with repayment terms of Rs. 5,000 monthly over 10 months. He claimed Thirunavukarasu repaid only one month's installment and provided a cheque that was rejected due to "bank not in clearing mode." Lourdhraj admitted to no written agreement, no witnesses to the loan transaction, and later filed a false cheque case. The court recorded his testimony regarding the loan's circumstances, repayment attempts, and disputes over vehicle documents and maintenance charges, ultimately accepting his sworn statement as evidence in the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC No. 151/2024 In this cross-examination testimony dated 30.10.2025, petitioner Lourdhraj gave evidence regarding an alleged loan dispute with respondent Thirunavukarasu. Lourdhraj testified that he lent Rs. 50,000 to Thirunavukarasu in October 2023 after his son's wedding, with repayment terms of Rs. 5,000 monthly over 10 months. He claimed Thirunavukarasu repaid only one month's installment and provided a cheque that was rejected due to "bank not in clearing mode." Lourdhraj admitted to no written agreement, no witnesses to the loan transaction, and later filed a false cheque case. The court recorded his testimony regarding the loan's circumstances, repayment attempts, and disputes over vehicle documents and maintenance charges, ultimately accepting his sworn statement as evidence in the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts