chitfund vs Chellam — 142/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138and142. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 06-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNSV120024662024

e-Filing Number

16-08-2024

Filing Number

2465/2024

Filing Date

29-Aug-2024

Registration No

142/2024

Registration Date

29-Aug-2024

Court

Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Karaikudi North Police Station

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138and142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.chitfund

    Adv. Nagaraj Nagaraj

  2. 2.S PALANIAPPAN DIVISIONAL MANAGER DHANALAKSHMI SRINIVASAN CHIT FUNDS PRIVATE LIMITED KARAIKUDI

    Adv. Nagaraj Nagaraj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chellam

Case History

  1. 06-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Copy of depositionView PDF

    In Case CC No. 142/2024 dated 18.04.2026, the Civil Court at Karaikudi heard cross-examination testimony from Palaniappan (witness for Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Chit Funds Private Limited) against respondent Chellam. The witness testified regarding disputes over chit fund documents and signatures, disputing their authenticity. The court recorded the witness examination and examination-in-chief statements, which were transcribed and read back to the witness for confirmation before being accepted into record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  8. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  9. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  10. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  11. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  12. 06-Oct-2025

    Mediation

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  13. 21-Aug-2025

    Mediation

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  14. 25-Jul-2025

    Mediation

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  15. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  16. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  17. 27-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  18. 21-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  19. 07-Apr-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  20. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  21. 26-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  22. 20-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  23. 04-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  24. 13-Nov-2024

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  25. 13-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  26. 29-Oct-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  27. 30-Sep-2024

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  28. 29-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 29-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 142/2024

casestatus.in Summary

In Case CC No. 142/2024 dated 18.04.2026, the Civil Court at Karaikudi heard cross-examination testimony from Palaniappan (witness for Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Chit Funds Private Limited) against respondent Chellam. The witness testified regarding disputes over chit fund documents and signatures, disputing their authenticity. The court recorded the witness examination and examination-in-chief statements, which were transcribed and read back to the witness for confirmation before being accepted into record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case