Rajendiran vs Ramasamy — 187/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV120023142024
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
e-Filing Number
09-08-2024
Filing Number
2313/2024
Filing Date
12-08-2024
Registration No
187/2024
Registration Date
28-10-2024
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajendiran
Adv. S Gowtham
Respondent(s)
Ramasamy
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
Evidence
Evidence
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-05-2026 | Questioning |
| 07-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC No. 187/2024 Case: Rajendiran v. Ramasamy Court: Karaikudi Civil Court Date: 15.05.2026 This is a civil case involving a land/real estate transaction dispute. Petitioner Rajendiran testified that respondent Ramasamy gave him documents (Aadhar card, bank book, check) and received ₹2,00,000 as alleged loan/advance in May 2021 for a real estate deal. Rajendiran claims he did not conduct any lending business and has no further claims against Ramasamy. The court recorded Rajendiran's cross-examination statement, wherein he clarified the transaction details and his relationship with Ramasamy through his brother-in-law Krishnan. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC No. 187/2024 Case: Rajendiran v. Ramasamy Court: Karaikudi Civil Court Date: 15.05.2026 This is a civil case involving a land/real estate transaction dispute. Petitioner Rajendiran testified that respondent Ramasamy gave him documents (Aadhar card, bank book, check) and received ₹2,00,000 as alleged loan/advance in May 2021 for a real estate deal. Rajendiran claims he did not conduct any lending business and has no further claims against Ramasamy. The court recorded Rajendiran's cross-examination statement, wherein he clarified the transaction details and his relationship with Ramasamy through his brother-in-law Krishnan. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts