Rajendiran vs Ramasamy — 187/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 06-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNSV120023142024

e-Filing Number

09-08-2024

Filing Number

2313/2024

Filing Date

12-Aug-2024

Registration No

187/2024

Registration Date

28-Oct-2024

Court

Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138
Code of Criminal Procedure Section 357

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajendiran

    Adv. S Gowtham

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramasamy

Case History

  1. 06-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  3. 22-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  4. 15-May-2026

    Copy of depositionView PDF

    Case Summary: CC No. 187/2024 Case: Rajendiran v. Ramasamy Court: Karaikudi Civil Court Date: 15.05.2026 This is a civil case involving a land/real estate transaction dispute. Petitioner Rajendiran testified that respondent Ramasamy gave him documents (Aadhar card, bank book, check) and received ₹2,00,000 as alleged loan/advance in May 2021 for a real estate deal. Rajendiran claims he did not conduct any lending business and has no further claims against Ramasamy. The court recorded Rajendiran's cross-examination statement, wherein he clarified the transaction details and his relationship with Ramasamy through his brother-in-law Krishnan. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 15-May-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  6. 07-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  7. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  8. 26-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  10. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  11. 12-Feb-2026

    Mediation

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  12. 20-Jan-2026

    Mediation

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  13. 10-Dec-2025

    Mediation

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  14. 06-Nov-2025

    Mediation

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  15. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  16. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  17. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  18. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  19. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  20. 11-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  21. 02-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  22. 03-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  23. 09-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  24. 15-Apr-2025

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  25. 15-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  26. 08-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  27. 07-Feb-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  28. 28-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  29. 13-Dec-2024

    Service Pending-Notice

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  30. 29-Nov-2024

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  31. 28-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 12-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 187/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 187/2024 Case: Rajendiran v. Ramasamy Court: Karaikudi Civil Court Date: 15.05.2026 This is a civil case involving a land/real estate transaction dispute. Petitioner Rajendiran testified that respondent Ramasamy gave him documents (Aadhar card, bank book, check) and received ₹2,00,000 as alleged loan/advance in May 2021 for a real estate deal. Rajendiran claims he did not conduct any lending business and has no further claims against Ramasamy. The court recorded Rajendiran's cross-examination statement, wherein he clarified the transaction details and his relationship with Ramasamy through his brother-in-law Krishnan. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case