Shankaramoorthy vs Mahalakshmi — 125/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Service Pending. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV120022772024
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
30-07-2024
Filing Number
2276/2024
Filing Date
08-08-2024
Registration No
125/2024
Registration Date
08-08-2024
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shankaramoorthy
Adv. Karthik Vakil
Respondent(s)
Mahalakshmi
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
Service Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Service Pending |
| 30-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 23-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 12-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 12-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition (DW.1) recorded on 29.01.2026 in Case 125/2024 before the Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court, Karaikudi. The witness (an MBA-educated IT professional) testified regarding a loan transaction where the complainant lent ₹1.21 lakhs to the accused; the witness signed as a witness on the debt acknowledgment document and confirmed the accused later repaid the full loan amount. Cross-examination was deferred, and the deposition was recorded and read back to the witness for confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition (DW.1) recorded on 29.01.2026 in Case 125/2024 before the Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court, Karaikudi. The witness (an MBA-educated IT professional) testified regarding a loan transaction where the complainant lent ₹1.21 lakhs to the accused; the witness signed as a witness on the debt acknowledgment document and confirmed the accused later repaid the full loan amount. Cross-examination was deferred, and the deposition was recorded and read back to the witness for confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts