Parimalam vs Karthick — 136/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV120021382024
Next Hearing
12th May 2026
e-Filing Number
21-07-2024
Filing Number
2137/2024
Filing Date
30-07-2024
Registration No
136/2024
Registration Date
22-08-2024
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
FIR Details
Police Station
Karaikudi North Police Station
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Parimalam
Adv. Karthik Vakil
Respondent(s)
Karthick
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 28-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 16-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
The court order dated 08.01.2026 in Civil Case No. 136/2024 from the Kariur District Court (Tamil Nadu) is a cross-examination statement where the complainant provides testimony regarding business operations, bank accounts, and alleged loans. The court has recorded the witness's sworn statement detailing disputes over financial transactions and claims regarding debts allegedly owed by the complainant to others, with the judge affirming the accuracy of the typewritten testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court order dated 08.01.2026 in Civil Case No. 136/2024 from the Kariur District Court (Tamil Nadu) is a cross-examination statement where the complainant provides testimony regarding business operations, bank accounts, and alleged loans. The court has recorded the witness's sworn statement detailing disputes over financial transactions and claims regarding debts allegedly owed by the complainant to others, with the judge affirming the accuracy of the typewritten testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts