Kumar vs Mutharasi — 94/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNSV120019252023

Evidence

Next Hearing

01st June 2026

Filing Number

1925/2023

Filing Date

20-06-2023

Registration No

94/2023

Registration Date

20-06-2023

Court

Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138
Mp/8/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Kumar(MP)Mutharasi(MR)
Mp/21/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section MutharasiKumar
Mp/22/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section MutharasiKumar

Petitioner(s)

Kumar

Adv. Tr.S.Gowtham

Respondent(s)

Mutharasi

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi

18-05-2026

Evidence

04-05-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

16-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

15-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

12-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

29-01-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: 94/2023 (Kumar v. Mutharasi) Outcome: The case was disposed of on 29.01.2026. In cross-examination, defendant Mutharasi denied the allegations, claiming she did not file the complaint against Kumar (stating another person filed it instead) and disputed making the payment of ₹1,30,000 as alleged. The court found her testimony credible where she admitted to certain facts presented as evidence, ultimately resulting in the case being concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 94/2023 (Kumar v. Mutharasi) Outcome: The case was disposed of on 29.01.2026. In cross-examination, defendant Mutharasi denied the allegations, claiming she did not file the complaint against Kumar (stating another person filed it instead) and disputed making the payment of ₹1,30,000 as alleged. The court found her testimony credible where she admitted to certain facts presented as evidence, ultimately resulting in the case being concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case