Thenmozhi vs Vanitha — 77/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV120016962024
e-Filing Number
22-05-2024
Filing Number
1696/2024
Filing Date
31-May-2024
Registration No
77/2024
Registration Date
31-May-2024
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Thenmozhi
Adv. bharathi raja
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vanitha
Case History
-
04-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-May-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
14-May-2026
Copy of deposition
Case 77/2024 Summary: In this cross-examination proceeding dated 14.05.2026, respondent Vanitha (daughter of Srinivasan) testified regarding a loan dispute with petitioner Thenmozhi. Vanitha admitted to borrowing ₹60,000 from Thenmozhi and repaying it in full with documentary evidence (Exhibit 2), but disputed claims of owing ₹2,00,000. The court found contradictions in Thenmozhi's statements regarding the total loan amount and concluded that Vanitha had satisfactorily repaid the substantiated debt of ₹60,000; the petition regarding the additional amount lacked sufficient documentary support. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-May-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
07-May-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
16-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of deposition
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
11-Dec-2025
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
13-Nov-2025
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
10-Nov-2025
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
03-Nov-2025
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
23-Oct-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
09-Oct-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
22-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
03-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
18-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
26-May-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
22-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
18-Mar-2025
Copy of deposition
-
18-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
04-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
18-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
20-Jan-2025
Copy of deposition
-
20-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
26-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
12-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
19-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
22-Oct-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
02-Sep-2024
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
06-Aug-2024
Copy of deposition
-
06-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
15-Jul-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
01-Jul-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
31-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 77/2024
Case 77/2024 Summary: In this cross-examination proceeding dated 14.05.2026, respondent Vanitha (daughter of Srinivasan) testified regarding a loan dispute with petitioner Thenmozhi. Vanitha admitted to borrowing ₹60,000 from Thenmozhi and repaying it in full with documentary evidence (Exhibit 2), but disputed claims of owing ₹2,00,000. The court found contradictions in Thenmozhi's statements regarding the total loan amount and concluded that Vanitha had satisfactorily repaid the substantiated debt of ₹60,000; the petition regarding the additional amount lacked sufficient documentary support. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts