Santiyagu Arockiam vs M/s Limenaph Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. company and 3 others — 81/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 142. Status: Stay. Next hearing: 15th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV120016632023
Next Hearing
15th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1663/2023
Filing Date
29-05-2023
Registration No
81/2023
Registration Date
29-05-2023
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Santiyagu Arockiam
Adv. Tr.S.V.Sankar
Respondent(s)
M/s Limenaph Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. company and 3 others
PB chinna Venkataraju
Sindhu
P.J. Balram
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
Stay
Stay
Stay
Stay
Stay
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Stay | |
| 23-04-2026 | Stay | |
| 30-03-2026 | Stay | |
| 10-03-2026 | Stay | |
| 23-01-2026 | Stay |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Petition Allowed. The court permitted the filing of a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 91 of the CrPC to allow defendants to produce nine specific documents including annual reports, income tax records, bank statements, GST returns, and personal bank account statements of Vidhai Distributors Private Limited and related parties. The court found that these documents are essential to determine the true nature of the dispute involving alleged loans and transactions between the parties, and that both parties should have an opportunity to present evidence under the principle of natural justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Petition Allowed. The court permitted the filing of a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 91 of the CrPC to allow defendants to produce nine specific documents including annual reports, income tax records, bank statements, GST returns, and personal bank account statements of Vidhai Distributors Private Limited and related parties. The court found that these documents are essential to determine the true nature of the dispute involving alleged loans and transactions between the parties, and that both parties should have an opportunity to present evidence under the principle of natural justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts