Thiruppathyrajan vs Vijakumar — 103/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 138 NI Act. Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 15th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV120014692022
Filing Number
1469/2022
Filing Date
21-07-2022
Registration No
103/2022
Registration Date
21-07-2022
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Conviction
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thiruppathyrajan
Adv. R.Abdulsiddiq
Respondent(s)
Vijakumar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
Disposed
Judgement
Service Pending
Service Pending
Service Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 08-04-2026 | Service Pending |
| 02-04-2026 | Service Pending |
| 24-03-2026 | Service Pending |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: C.C. 103/2022 - Thiruppathyrajan v. Vijakumar Court Decision: The court convicted the accused Vijakumar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring two cheques (₹5,00,000 and ₹10,00,000) issued toward returning advance amounts from a failed property sale agreement. The court sentenced him to one year simple imprisonment and ordered compensation of ₹15,00,000 to the complainant within one month, with an additional three-month imprisonment in case of default. Key Reasoning: The accused admitted executing the cheques but failed to rebut the statutory presumption under Sections 118-139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, presented no credible defense, and did not respond to the legal notice despite receiving it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: C.C. 103/2022 - Thiruppathyrajan v. Vijakumar Court Decision: The court convicted the accused Vijakumar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring two cheques (₹5,00,000 and ₹10,00,000) issued toward returning advance amounts from a failed property sale agreement. The court sentenced him to one year simple imprisonment and ordered compensation of ₹15,00,000 to the complainant within one month, with an additional three-month imprisonment in case of default. Key Reasoning: The accused admitted executing the cheques but failed to rebut the statutory presumption under Sections 118-139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, presented no credible defense, and did not respond to the legal notice despite receiving it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts