Somasundaram vs Kokila — 54/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV120011012024
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
08-04-2024
Filing Number
1101/2024
Filing Date
18-04-2024
Registration No
54/2024
Registration Date
18-04-2024
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Somasundaram
Adv. karthick narayanan
Respondent(s)
Kokila
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-05-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 19-05-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 11-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 08-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-05-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition record (PW.3) in Criminal Case 54/2024 before the Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court, Karaikudi, dated 21.08.2025. The witness Saravanan testified regarding a loan of ₹9 lakh advanced by his brother to the respondent (Kokila) on 05.11.2022, with an agreement to repay within one year, supported by a promissory note. During cross-examination, discrepancies were raised regarding the witness's signature on the promissory note versus the government record, and the witness's relationship to the petitioner was questioned, with the court noting inconsistencies in his testimony regarding the date and place of the transaction and the respondent's presence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition record (PW.3) in Criminal Case 54/2024 before the Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court, Karaikudi, dated 21.08.2025. The witness Saravanan testified regarding a loan of ₹9 lakh advanced by his brother to the respondent (Kokila) on 05.11.2022, with an agreement to repay within one year, supported by a promissory note. During cross-examination, discrepancies were raised regarding the witness's signature on the promissory note versus the government record, and the witness's relationship to the petitioner was questioned, with the court noting inconsistencies in his testimony regarding the date and place of the transaction and the respondent's presence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts