Narayanan vs Veeramanikandan — 51/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNSV120010542024

Evidence

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

e-Filing Number

03-04-2024

Filing Number

1054/2024

Filing Date

15-04-2024

Registration No

51/2024

Registration Date

15-04-2024

Court

Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138
Indian Penal Code Section 420

Petitioner(s)

Narayanan

Adv. BALAJI KANNAN

Respondent(s)

Veeramanikandan

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi

26-05-2026

Evidence

20-05-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

07-05-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

30-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

02-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

09-10-2025
Copy of deposition

Case Summary: CC No. 51/2024 Date: 09.10.2025 This is a cross-examination testimony in a civil case between Narayanan (petitioner) and Veeramanikandan (respondent). Narayanan testified regarding vehicle sales transactions and financial dealings with respondent's company. He denied allegations of misappropriating funds, claiming money transfers to his bank account were personal loans from company managers, not unauthorized appropriations. The court recorded his detailed testimony covering employment history, banking transactions, disputed financial transfers, and his defense that he followed proper procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 51/2024 Date: 09.10.2025 This is a cross-examination testimony in a civil case between Narayanan (petitioner) and Veeramanikandan (respondent). Narayanan testified regarding vehicle sales transactions and financial dealings with respondent's company. He denied allegations of misappropriating funds, claiming money transfers to his bank account were personal loans from company managers, not unauthorized appropriations. The court recorded his detailed testimony covering employment history, banking transactions, disputed financial transfers, and his defense that he followed proper procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case