Chitra vs Muthu — 43/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV120008252024
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2024
Filing Number
825/2024
Filing Date
18-03-2024
Registration No
43/2024
Registration Date
18-03-2024
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chitra
Adv. Vijaya V
Respondent(s)
Muthu
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC No. 43/2024 Date: 26.02.2026 Parties: Chitra (Petitioner) vs. Muthu (Respondent) Outcome: This is a civil case involving a loan dispute. The court conducted cross-examination of the respondent (Muthu), during which he testified regarding a loan of Rs. 12 lakhs allegedly given to the petitioner (Chitra's husband) on 21.11.2021. The respondent's testimony covered details about the loan transaction, the couple's marriage on 10.06.2022, the source of funds (from pledging gold and savings), and various financial matters. The court recorded the respondent's sworn statement and admissions during examination. The case has been recorded for further proceedings, with the court noting inconsistencies in the respondent's testimony regarding dates, amounts, and circumstances of the alleged loan transaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC No. 43/2024 Date: 26.02.2026 Parties: Chitra (Petitioner) vs. Muthu (Respondent) Outcome: This is a civil case involving a loan dispute. The court conducted cross-examination of the respondent (Muthu), during which he testified regarding a loan of Rs. 12 lakhs allegedly given to the petitioner (Chitra's husband) on 21.11.2021. The respondent's testimony covered details about the loan transaction, the couple's marriage on 10.06.2022, the source of funds (from pledging gold and savings), and various financial matters. The court recorded the respondent's sworn statement and admissions during examination. The case has been recorded for further proceedings, with the court noting inconsistencies in the respondent's testimony regarding dates, amounts, and circumstances of the alleged loan transaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts